Tuesday, September 26, 2017

 

Nazi Atomic Bomb


September 25, 2017
Massive Cover-up Begins After “Final Proof” Shows Atomic Bomb Traded To US For Nazi Safety
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An intriguing Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) has embarked upon a massive informational cover-up after a “final proof” discovery was made this past week showing that the Nazis were, indeed, the first world power to develop an atomic bomb during World War II—and that Soviet intelligence experts have always maintained was “traded/bartered” to the American’s in return for their saving the lives of all top German Nazi officials, including Adolph Hitler.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

German physicist Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker submits patent for atomic bomb in 1941

According to this report, this past week, in Brandenberg, Germany, a 64-year-old treasure hunter named Bernd Thälmann discovered a large metallic object subsequently identified as Uranium-235—and who after making this shocking discovery, he was quickly jailed by German police for his alleged illegal possession of radioactive materials.

Though not understood by many today, this report continues, the location of the discovery of this piece of Uranium-235 places it near the Nazi-era chemical company known as Deutsche Gesellschaft für Schädlingsbekämpfung located in Oranienburg—and whose company name is simplified to Degesch whose translation means: German Corporation For Pest Control—and who aside from their development of industrial-scale, high-purity uranium oxides, is more infamously known for their producing the Zyklon B pesticide used to kill millions of Jewish peoples during The Holocaust—and who today is one of the world's leading specialty chemicals companies known as Evonik Industries.


In 2011, this report details, German historian Rainer Karlsch exhaustively detailed in his research book titled “Hitlers Bombe” (translation: Hitler’s Bomb) the critical role played by Degesch in the development of the Nazis atomic bomb—and whose eyewitnesses to its testing includes:

German test pilot named Hans Zinsser, who testified to US military investigators that he saw a “mushroom cloud” near the Nazi nuclear research facility at Ludwgslust in 1944, and who stated: “A cloud shaped like a mushroom with turbulent, billowing sections (at about 7,000 meters) stood, without any seeming connections over the spot where the explosion took place. Strong electrical disturbances and the impossibility to continue radio communication as by lighting turned up.”—and as was verified by his logbook recordings.

Thuringian resident Clare Werner, who, on 4 March1945, testified that she was standing on a nearby hillside when she witnessed an explosion in a military training area near the town of Ohrdruf—and who stated: “It was about 9:30 when I suddenly saw something ... it was as bright as hundreds of bolts of lightning, red on the inside and yellow on the outside, so bright you could've read the newspaper. It all happened so quickly, and then we couldn't see anything at all. We just noticed there was a powerful wind...”—and who further complained of “nose bleeds, headaches and pressure in the ears”.

Heinz Wachsmut, also a Thuringian resident, who testified that he worked for a local excavating company, and that the day after the atomic blast occurred, as described by Clare Werner, he was ordered to help the SS build wooden platforms on which the corpses of prisoners were cremated.  The bodies, according to Wachsmut, were covered with horrific burn wounds. Like Werner, too, Wachsmut testified that local residents complained of headaches, some even spitting up blood—with Wachsmut further testifying that higher-ranking SS officers told people that something new had been tested, “something the entire world would soon be talking about”.

Luigi Romersa, a war reporter for a Milan newspaper, Corriere della Sera, who testified about how he visited Adolf Hitler in October 1944 and then was flown to Rügen Island in the Baltic Sea where he witnessed an explosion that produced a bright light, and that men wearing protective suits then drove him away from the site, telling him that what he had witnessed was a fission bomb.

Photo credit: Luigi Romersa/Corriere della Sera, 1944

During 1944-1945, too, this report continues, “Red Orchestra” (one of the most successful spy rings that operated during World War II) continuously flooded the Kremlin with intelligence describing these atomic bomb blasts and describing how the production of Uranium-235 was being performed in vast subterranean tunnels—and though the American’s had, indeed, destroyed the Nazi nuclear facility of Peenemunde, the Nazi’s Island of Bornholm nuclear facility was never attacked.

During the 4-11 February 1945 Yalta Conference, this report continues, General Secretary Joseph Stalin expressed his fears about Germany’s atomic bomb to US President Franklin Roosevelt—and who further warned the American’s that “Red Orchestra” intelligence was stating that the Germans were stating that they were preparing their bombers to destroy Western Europe in 3 months, after which they would strike a violent blow against the United States. 

Upon receiving General Secretary Stalin’s warnings, however, this report details, President Roosevelt, in turn, revealed his nations “Manhattan Project” programme to build an atomic bomb—and with Roosevelt, also, assuring Stalin that American’s nuclear scientists had determined that no such atomic bomb could be developed by anyone before 1947. 


General Secretary Stalin, of course, this report continues, did not believe anything President Roosevelt had told him as the “Red Orchestra” reports were too substantial in their reporting of the Nazi’s testing an atomic bomb to be ignored—and that flew in the face of logic as German physicist Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker had, in 1941, already submitted a German patent application for using a uranium machine to, in essence, make an atomic bomb

At the ending of the Yalta Conference in February, 1945, this report explains, the estimated manpower of the Wehrmacht (unified armed forces of Nazi Germany) was estimated to be between 11-13 million—and that after World War II ended was confirmed as being true—but that according to calculations made by the US Army, these soldiers–man for man and unit for unit–were 20 to 30 percent more effective than was the British and American forces they faced.


So it was a complete, and shocking, surprise, this report continues, when, on 7 May 1945, the Wehrmacht unconditionally surrendered—with barely any of their military commanders facing war crimes trial for the atrocities they had committed, and even worse, nearly all of Nazi Germany’s top leadership disappearing from the face of the Earth—most especially to include the Chief of the Gestapo (the secret Nazi police) Heinrich Müller, who, along with Adolph Hitler, was last reported to be in a Berlin bunker—with neither one of them ever being heard from again. 

Three months after the Wehrmacht surrendered, this report further notes, the American’s dropped what they said were their atomic bombs on the Empire of Japan—but whose effects of matched exactly those given by those who had witnessed the Nazi’s atomic bomb being tested.


Coinciding with these atomic bombs being dropped on the Empire of Japan, this report continues, the American’s, also, smuggled out of captured Nazi territory to the United States nearly 2,000 German scientists, engineers, and technicians—that they labeled “Operation Paperclip”, thus prevented war crime charges from being brought against some of the worst barbarians our world has ever known—and US intelligence (military and CIA) further secreting top Nazi leaders to South America along the “Ratline Network”. 

With the only evidence of Adolph Hitler’s death being a skull fragment that was proved to be that of an unknown woman by DNA testing in 2009, this report says, even the United States FBI remains clueless as to the fate of this Nazi leader—but that General Secretary Stalin had always believed had his life, and those of his other Nazi leaders, exchanged for their giving the American’s their atomic bomb.


To the effect of the American’s colluding with these Nazis, this report concludes, began to be seen in the United States less than 23 years after World War II ended, when, in 1968, the US Congress adopted in its entirety Nazi Germany’s 1938 Weapons Law—and that over these past nearly 50 years has, also, seen this once free nation become nearly identical to Nazi Germany where the elite corporate and banking classes rules over a citizenry kept under total surveillance and control—and who are never allowed to know the truth about anything.   


September 25, 2017 © EU and US all rights reserved.  Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.] 

[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]

[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]

Source:  http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2392.htm

Labels: ,


Wednesday, September 13, 2017

 

Reduce Your Exposure To WiFi Radiation


WiFi Radiation – How To Protect Yourself

Do you need to protect yourself from WiFi radiation?

I guess the first question that needs to be answered is ‘what is WiFi radiation?’ Which leads to the question ‘is WiFi safe?’

Because if you’re not clear about these questions it’s pointless talking about WiFi radiation protection.

What Is WiFi Radiation?

WiFi devices emit radio-frequency radiation, otherwise known as microwave radiation. Most wireless routers and similar wireless devices emit a field of wireless radiation 24/7.

This microwave radiation is exactly the same kind of radiation that microwave ovens use to cook food.

Basically a microwave oven bombards your food with microwave radiation. This creates molecular friction which heats up the food. It’s known as ‘the heating effect’ or ‘the thermal effect’.

WiFi devices like wireless modem routers and wireless computers contain transmitters that use this microwave radiation to send information back and forth in the air.

Luis Hernan, a student at Newcastle University in the UK, has produced a series of photographs using an Arduino based Kirlian device that can show the strength of wireless signals according to color.

Cell phone in WiFi mode - Luis Hernan
Cell phone in WiFi mode – Luis Hernan

Is WiFi Safe?

Independent research links WiFi radiation to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:
    • increased blood brain barrier permeability
    • disruption to brain glucose metabolism
    • DNA chain breaks
    • generation of stress proteins
    • disruption of cell metabolism
In other studies, it is reported that WiFi radiation commonly causes such symptoms as fatigue, irritability, constant daily headaches and digestive disorders. And long-term exposure to radiation has been linked with many serious diseases including brain tumors.

The whole controversy surrounding the safety of these exposures revolves around this heating effect.

On the one side there is the telecom industry and other vested interests. They say that because there is no observable thermal effect (no heating effect), with WiFi and similar devices that these technologies are safe.

On the other side there are now thousands of peer reviewed studies conducted by scientists from around the world that show WiFi radiation to be potentially extremely harmful. Not to mention extensive anecdotal evidence – this website alone is littered with thousands of testimonials from people that have experienced severe adverse health symptoms from these exposures.

The World Health Organization has classified WiFi radiation type exposures as a ‘possible Class 2B carcinogen’.

What Are The Benefits To Protecting Yourself From WiFi?

People report these immediate benefits to eliminating/significantly reducing the wireless exposures in their environment:
  • improved sleep
  • having more energy
  • head feels better/clearer
  • room feels cooler
  • skin feels less prickly
  • no longer has metallic taste in the mouth
  • feeling more relaxed
The long term potential benefits of reducing your exposure to WiFi are that you DON’T suffer the adverse biological effects and diseases associated with WiFi as listed previously.

WiFi Radiation Protection Tips

There are some simple steps you can take to limit your exposure to WiFi router radiation. In this article I explain what they are.

1. Buy A JRS Eco-WiFi Router

Why? Because it offers a radically safer alternative to standard WiFi.

The JRS Eco-WiFi router is actually a package. It’s composed of:
  • An Asus router
  • JRS Eco-Wifi software
It’s the JRS software that gives the Asus router it’s unique low EMF functionality. You see, classic or standard WiFi operates at 10 pulses per second where as JRS-Eco WiFi operates at 1 pulse per second. This 10x reduced pulse interval translates to a 90% reduction in WiFi radiation when the router is on stand-by.  To see exactly what I mean, watch this video.

The other reason to invest in a JRS Eco-WiFi Router is that it offers the same performance as regular WiFi. You get the same download speeds, the same data transmission capacity… the same performance but JRS-Eco WiFi is a LOT safer than regular WiFi.

The ideal set-up is the JRS Eco-WiFi Router and some good quality shielded Ethernet cable.

Learn more about the JRS Eco-WiFi Router here.

2. Use The Right Ethernet Cable

shielded ethernet cable to reduce wifi radiation exposuresYour Ethernet cable is the cable that links your modem/router to your PC. It provides you with a hardwired internet connection.

Most people don’t give this cable a second thought. They use the cable which comes with the modem/router. Mistake.

This Ethernet cable can be a source of RF radiation and so needs to be shielded. There are lots of different qualities of cable category 5, 6, 7 etc. I recommend buying at least Cat 6a SSTP (screened shielded twisted pair) Ethernet cable. Maybe the cable that came with your modem/router is Cat 6a SSTP. In that case you’re OK. If in doubt change it.

3. Disable Wireless Function On ALL Your Devices

You’ve disabled the wireless on the modem/router but you must also disable the wireless on your on your computer (desktop, laptop, iPod Touche, iPad, tablet) AND also printers, projectors and anything else that might have Wi-Fi capability. Again a lot of people overlook this. Look for software options on these devices to do this.

Lower Wi-Fi power intensity is now an option on certain wireless set-ups. Look carefully what the software allows you to do. And keep your eye on it once you’ve changed the settings to make sure the default settings don’t come back on again.

If you’re unable to disable Wifi via the software you may be able to have the WiFi module physically removed (requires some electrical knowledge).

4. Swap Wireless For Wired

Replace your wireless keyboard, mouse, printer, scanner and whatever else you have that is wireless with USB wired versions. Solutions now exist even to connect devices such as iPads, which are not designed to be hardwired, to the Internet via a USB Ethernet adapter as shown in this video:

To implement the solution shown in the above video you will need:

5. Neighbors WiFi

Legally there is nothing you can do to oblige your neighbors to remove their WiFi so you need to have a softly softly approach. Go and see them, have a friendly chat. Ideally take an RF meter with you, show them the radiation levels they are exposing both you and themselves to. Take some print outs of some of the studies that have been done on the dangers of radio frequency radiation.

If they are unsympathetic EMF shielding should be considered only as a last resort measure. An effective WiFi radiation shield may well involve shielding several rooms – this is no small undertaking.

Reduce Your Exposure To WiFi Radiation Without Eliminating It

I know that some people can’t quite bring themselves to surrender their wireless devices so here are some tips on minimizing WiFi without eliminating WiFi.

1. Keep your distance

WiFi radiation exposures drop off significantly with distance (called the inverse square law). Many routers have a strong enough signal to maintain a connection up to 100m from the router. Make sure you put as much distance between you and your wireless router as you can without diminishing the efficiency of your connection. Remember: walls don’t stop wireless radiation, never situate a wireless router behind a bedroom wall.

2. Switch off at Night

Studies tell us that the biggest danger with WiFi radiation comes from nighttime exposures; cellular

 regeneration,mechanical timer to reduce emf exposures from a modem router rejuvenation, and detoxification is impeded. Notably melatonin production can be significantly reduced. If you really can’t bring yourself to remove your wireless router you can install a simple mechanical electrical timer (see attached image) on the socket where you plug your router in. Then just set it to turn the power off during sleep time.

I also recommend combining the mechanical timer with a multi-outlet power strip, sometimes called a surge protection unit. First you plug all your computer devices, , laptop/desktop, printer, monitor into your power strip. Then you plug the power strip into your mechanical timer which you then plug into the wall.
power stripThis means that when you set your timer to switch off from 10 pm to 6 pm, for instance, that it switches EVERYTHING off that’s plugged into your power strip. There are two advantages here, besides saving money on your utility bill, you also eliminate any EMF emissions that these appliances are producing.

My recommendation is to use a power strip that has surge arrest which will also ensure your equipment is protected from over-voltages (i.e. lightening strikes) and that it’s grounded.

3. Use USB Adaptors Wisely

If you use a USB Wi-Fi adapter (for PCs that don’t have a built in wireless network interface card) use it on a USB extension cable (10 feet or more). The same goes if you use a 3G or 4G USB internet stick, or dongle, to connect to the Internet while you’re traveling. A USB extension cable will significantly reduce your exposure. Tip: the further the USB internet stick is from you when you’re surfing the Web, the less you will be exposed.  Buy a USB extension that’s a good 10 to 15 feet long.

Is Powerline Networking The Solution?

This goes under various names ‘powerline networking’,’broadband over power lines’ (BPL) or ‘Powerline Ethernet’. Whichever name is used the principle is the same,  special adapters are used to send the Internet signal through your home or office wiring. What does this mean? It means you don’t need to have WiFi BUT these adapters do introduce radio frequency signals (RF radiation) on to your house wiring.

Combining RF radiation with power line frequency electrics is known to give rise to the phenomenon of ‘dirty electricity’. There are many health issues associated with dirty electricity. For this reason I do not recommend BPL as a safe alternative to WiFi.

Are Harmonizers And Neutralizers The Solution?

There all sorts of energy devices on the market which claim to harmonize and/or neutralize WiFi radiation. I do not believe that you should rely on these devices to form the basis of your approach to EMF protection. And I’m not alone. Over the years I have spoken to dozens of scientists, electrical engineers, researchers and EMF experts about this.

On this question professional engineer and Building Biologist Michael Schwaebe says, “when we choose to have an energy device to remedy something we know that’s wrong with us, what happens is that we often delay taking a pro­active move to mitigate our exposure so our exposure continues and ultimately the biology is affected at some point.

The dangers of WiFi are real. Use the above tips to mitigate your exposure to WiFi radiation.
Of course there is no cast iron guarantee that if you do reduce your exposure you won’t suffer any of the adverse effects associated with WiFi because unfortunately most people can’t feel these adverse effects, they just fall ill. What’s worse is they never make the link between these exposures and their illness.

Just try switching off your WiFi for one week and see the results for yourself.

How to live a naturally healthy life

Labels: , , ,


Friday, September 08, 2017

 

Cordless Phones are More Dangerous than Cell Phones




Cordless Phones: Even More Dangerous Than Cell Phones?

If you thought you could solve the problem of cell phone radiation by switching back to your landline phone and your landline is a cordless phone, think again.

Studies (1) show that cordless phones emit radiation just the same as cell phones.

In some cases cordless phones are more dangerous than cell phones.

Most cordless phones use DECT (Digital European Cordless Telephone) technology. The handset and the base of the phone, emit pulsed microwave radiation.

Cancer Link With Cordless Phone Radiation

Research from Swedish scientists concludes that cordless phones raise the risk of developing cancer. After evaluating malignant brain tumor patients’ usage of cell phones vs. their usage of cordless phones, they found the cancer risk was multiplied for those who used DECT cordless phones.

Combining cordless phones and cell phones made the risk even higher.

Another problem is the radiation levels. In some cases the radiation from a DECT cordless phone base is higher than the radiation levels found near a cell phone tower.

The third problem is that most cordless phones emit radiation from the handset, as well as the base, at full power, even when the phone isn’t in use.

Watch my short video on cordless phone radiation to better understand what I’m talking about:
DECT cordless handsets send radiation throughout your entire house – 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
The same goes for the base station, sometimes called the charging unit. All the one’s I’ve tested also emit radiation 24/7.

Cell Phone Dangers Bring Cordless Phone Radiation Into The Limelight

People have always loved the idea of being able to talk to one another across distances. At one time tin cans attached to a long string were used to communicate.

In the 19th century the first telephones came onto the scene. Ever since then we have been refining and reinventing the “talking telegraph”.

If you’re older than forty then you can remember when all telephones had a cord attached to them. This grounded them to the incoming telephone line – it was a cumbersome but effective.

You might remember using extra-long phone lines to connect your phone to the jack so you could roam about your house. Even that was pretty liberating.

When the cordless phone came into being in the 1980s there was no going back. They quickly became the household norm.

In a matter of a very few years we went from relatively low power, low frequency analog cordless phones to high power, higher frequency (some of the new phones operate at 5.8 Gigahertz) pulsed radiation DECT models.

Because telephone advances happened faster than we could understand the relationship between their radiation levels and cancer risk, cordless phones weren’t viewed as a health problem. Not until cell phone use brought the risk of brain cancer to light.

Is Cordless Phone Radiation Worse Than Cell Phone Radiation?



Yes, it is in some circumstances.

With electromagnetic fields (EMFs), proximity to the source of the EMFs and length of exposure are two very important factors.

Do you sleep with your head just a few inches from a DECT cordless phone?

If you do you are exposing yourself to significant levels of cordless phone radiation at the time of day when your body is the most vulnerable.

This is the worst type of cordless phone radiation exposure.

Neither DECT cordless phones nor cell phones are conducive to optimum health.

Combining the two, that’s to say occasional use of a cell phone and merely being in an environment where a cordless phone is in proximity, you are exposing your self to a serious health risk.

As respected Harley Street physician Dr. David Dowson comments, “having a cordless phone is like having a mobile mast in your house. I’d recommend anyone who has one to switch to a plug-in phone.

How To Reduce Your Exposure

Throw away your cordless phone and go back to using a corded phone. Problem solved!

It’s that easy. But is it? I know you’re listening to what I am saying here, but are you really ready for to take this step?

Don’t feel guilty when you answer this. If I hadn’t experienced electrical sensitivity I’d probably have a cordless phone just like everyone else.

If you’re not ready to throw out your cordless here’s what you can do to minimize your EMF exposure and feel a little less guilty:
  1. Unplug your cordless phone when you are not using it for long periods, particularly at night – that’s to say physically remove the plug from the electric socket on the wall AND remove the handsets from areas where you spend time. Even unplugged, charged handsets can still emit EMFs (handset seeking to connect with the base) until the battery has run down
  2. Put the base of your cordless phone a safe distance, at least 6 feet away, from where you spend any significant amount of time – remember EMFs travel through walls
  3. Plug your cordless phone in only when you use it. You might need to plug it in an hour or two before, but once charged most DECTs have 4 or 5 days autonomy (you can store it a metal container to limit radiation emissions whilst it’s discharging)
  4. Keep your conversations short and use the speakerphone function when you can so that you keep it away from your head as much as possible
  5. Have at least one corded phone in your home so if you do disconnect your cordless phones you’ve still got a phone to use

Low EMF Corded Phone – Better For your Health?

Even though a long telephone wire can look messy, my advice is play safe. Being tethered to your land line phone jack is a small price to pay for long term improved health.

If you are hesitating replacing your cordless DECT phone with a corded phone don’t hesitate any longer. Using a low EMF corded phone (thats to say a model which has an inbuilt speakerphone and jack, for corded headset, prefer “airtube” version) will reduce your EMF exposures significantly.

A basic model will suffice for most people, but more sophisticated corded telephones are also available with answering machine.

Another alternative is to find an old analog cordless phone not as safe as a corded phone but considered much safer than the DECT technology – works at a lower frequency – the EMFs are not pulsed.

Have You Got The Message?

Did you ‘get’ that if you use your DECT cordless phone near its base your exposures are higher? They’re higher because you’re exposing yourself to a double dose of EMFs. You get zapped with the radiation from the phone AND from the base unit.

Do you and your family a favor deal with your cordless phone radiation exposures today.

How to live a naturally healthy life

Sources include:
(1) Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Sep;79(8):630-9. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997-2003.
Hardell L1, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K.

Labels: , ,


Wednesday, September 06, 2017

 

Dirty Electricity

The Dirty Electricity Story



The sheer volume of modern electronics and appliances in homes and other settings has increased at a dizzying rate. While, this proliferation of electrical devices has made our lives more efficient and convenient, it has also contributed to a potentially harmful form of electro-pollution known as DIRTY ELECTRICITY.

Dirty electricity is unusable electromagnetic energy that is created by many electrical devices as they operate. It is caused by interruptions in the flow of normal 60-Hertz AC (alternating current) power traveling through wires and electrical systems in homes and other buildings. These interruptions result in voltage spikes, or surges, as well as frequency variations (also called high frequency voltage transients) that combine to form a complex and potentially harmful electromagnetic field.

How do electronic devices contribute to dirty electricity?



Many modern electronics and appliances include transformers that convert the AC power in a building’s wiring to the DC power needed to run electronics and appliances. During this conversion process, interruptions in electrical current flow occur. In addition, many modern electronic devices (e.g., light dimmer switches, compact fluorescent light bulbs, equipment that use switching mode power supplies) utilize power in a more complicated way than more “old-fashioned” electronics and equipment. These devices are actually designed to operate with interrupted electric current flow. Rather than draw power continuously, they do so intermittently in variable amounts at a high frequency, primarily for efficiency. While this can save energy, it involves frequent interruptions in electric current flow. For example, a compact fluorescent light bulb saves energy by turning itself on and off repeatedly, thousands of times per second. Regular interruptions like these create transients (i.e., voltage spikes/surges and frequency variations) that “dirty” the normal electricity flowing along wires.

What happens to dirty electricity once it is generated?  The dirty electricity created by electrical devices within a building is circulated throughout the building, and even to other buildings in the neighborhood, via wiring. It radiates into the immediate environment via outlets, power strips, electronic devices, and cords/wires, exposing the humans inside to electromagnetic pollution.

Source: www.dirtyelectricity.net

Labels:


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?